Thursday, March 5, 2015
Painless and Effective Dog Training.
The following procedures paper trained a 6 wk puppy in a couple of hours, an ex-stray, and several other dogs.
The philosophy behind the training, (post hoc) is that dogs are human symbiotes per Jon Franklin's The Wolf in the Parlor and are eager to learn to help. I learned it from a bird dog trainer who insisted that his dog was his partner and not his servant or toy. For him dominance and control techniques were useless as they produced a dog that wouldn't hunt. Note that his dogs were collar free while hunting and most other times. He carried the tags.
Any dog even a difficult dog will do something right in a training session, short at first. The first command I train is WAIT. When the dog stops at any time after the command a unique and instant verbal reward is given. I use "Gooddog" a friend uses Hai-Hai. This will surprise the dog and in my experience even the first time the dog will look back and get another instant Gooddog. As the dog continues to play the command and verbal reward are quickly associated in the dog's mind.
After the training session is over a special self selected treat, in my dog's case a turkey hot dog bit is offered when the dog is called, asked to WAIT just before arriving, gets the Gooddog, looks up, another Gooddog, then the treat. Note that the treat is offered after the training session. After a session or two more, the dog will follow to where the treats are kept and look for the treat. In my case I keep the treats at my desk upstairs away from his food and play areas. Training treats are special.
I escalate the WAIT training until the dog stops in his tracks whatever he is doing even chasing the neighborhood cat. The first escalation is a slack leash WAIT. No training harness, choke collar or other negative reinforcement needed.
HEEL, PARK, STAY, and other useful commands are taught the same way. Tell the dog to HEEL in command voice, and sooner or later he will end up at your side get the Gooddog look up and get another Gooddog. It doesn't take long before the later becomes now. At that point I end the session, and finish the walk. I was not surprised when we got home and he HEELed all the way to my desk for his special treat. He also got one for WAIT which is reinforced every walk at curbs and other danger spots and the neighborhood cat. Note that every walk is a training session and good behavior of any kind even ignoring the neighborhood cat gets a Gooddog and if he looks up another Gooddog. It is amusing that he seems to count things on a walk that get reinforced and remind me that he needs another treat if I forget one. Usually ignoring the cat that I didn't notice.
Like most dogs he will announce the fact that someone is on the property, and since we have frequent visitors, the PARK command is his signal to stop barking, and back away from the door. He gets a Gooddog for barking, another for parking, and a third for being welcoming to a known visitor. By now it is routine and he waits until the end of the day to remind me that he has been a Gooddog many times.
I use OK as the release command but if I were starting over I would choose a different word probably CLEAR as an unusual word that he does not hear every day. It may be a moot point since he seems to respond to my mental state of clear at curbs. I began to notice after reading Franklin that he was always a fraction of a second ahead of the OK. I began to delay the verbal command and found that I was catching up to his reaction for most commands including WAIT.
This post like all on this blog is a work in progress, and comments are open. Suggestions and stories are welcome.
On Knowing Enough
I live in the open mindedness
Of not knowing enough
About anything. - Mary Oliver
Via Jen Walker among others.
Of not knowing enough
About anything. - Mary Oliver
Via Jen Walker among others.
The Trinity as Schizophrenia
beliefnet
For the Jews the angry, vengeful, murderous, personality was dominant, although the priestly rule-maker tried to keep the people under control, and the storyteller Jahwist tried to make sense of it all for humans.
For Catholics and many Christians the forgiving, empathetic and human centered personality is dominant, although he seems to have had trouble keeping the "My Way or the Highway" rule-maker under control, especially when the political pressure on the humanist became too intense and he had to suppress that personality.
Other Christians focus on the "My Way" personality.
It is very simple they all worship God, and the necessary personality shows up at the right time.
Thoughtful theist No, God would be strictly, numerically identical to the three taken collectively. Your interpretation is explicitly ruled out by the Athanasian creed, which I've already quoted as well as your favorite internet sources - which btw - don't support your reading at all. I'm still waiting for you to post your "data" as you called them.
Blü No. God would be strictly identical not onto to the plurality of the three, but simultaneously strictly identical to EACH of them.Neither is correct. God is a single entity with three personalities striving for dominance only one of which can be expressed at any one time. And this all before there were serotonin antagonists to help.
For the Jews the angry, vengeful, murderous, personality was dominant, although the priestly rule-maker tried to keep the people under control, and the storyteller Jahwist tried to make sense of it all for humans.
For Catholics and many Christians the forgiving, empathetic and human centered personality is dominant, although he seems to have had trouble keeping the "My Way or the Highway" rule-maker under control, especially when the political pressure on the humanist became too intense and he had to suppress that personality.
Other Christians focus on the "My Way" personality.
It is very simple they all worship God, and the necessary personality shows up at the right time.
Monday, March 2, 2015
Why God(s)
My problem is not so much finding God, everybody and herm sibling will show you God. My problem is what to do with them once I have found them. So far the only use I have found is as inspiration for artists and musicians. Not trivial, great art and music is always a benefit to humanity no matter who or what it is celebrating. But as for the Gods themselves, nothing for me.beliefnet thoughtful theist
I don't attempt to show it. You must investigate the possibility yourself, as I'm sure you have and do. And no, I'm not arguing that if something's not seen then it exists; and I'm not even arguing that absence of evidence is evidence of absence. In the case of God, who is, he can be detected. But not, naturally enough, by those whose preconceptions rule out such a thing.
Thursday, February 26, 2015
Communities Rules About Sexual Conduct.
Rational Christian All religions have rules about sexual conduct.
Believer No, I said that I didn't feel that some forms of marriage are of equal dignity and honor as others. I commented on aberrations from traditional, normative marriage.
All
communities have rules about sexual
conduct.
Right now in
universities throughout the developed world are having vehement discussions and
legal battles about what constitutes rape. These all boil down to the
issue of whether a man has the right to have sex with whoever he wants
to. Note that universities are generally secular
institutions.
These issues have
nothing at all to do with the traditional definitions of marriage and adultery,
just whether a woman has any choice in the matter. The issue of choice by women is why
many religions are so protective of their normative marriage rules.
In my ERSSG affirmatively consensual, non-procreative, responsible sex has few other restrictions or rules. And cohabitation agreements may or may not be legally formalized and generally have little to do with sexual conduct.
The exception is when a (usually) couple decides to include children in their relationship either naturally or by adoption. At that point all of society's rules, laws, and traditions of marriage become important and the formalization of the relationship becomes imperative. It is perhaps ironic that the religious marriage traditions which assumed lots of children a few of which survived to puberty, became an established legal structure in which to raise the few children required for replacement of ones memes and/or genes.
Sunday, February 22, 2015
Religion - Definition
Beliefnet
Religion for me involves two components. The first is an irrational belief in the superiority of some conceptual entity, God, the Buddha, The Tao, Deepak Chopra, a sport team, a political position, etc. The second is a passionate commitment to that belief in the sense of spending considerable time and money on following the belief. Wearing the "colors," going to events, socializing preferentially with those of a similar religion, and usually dislike or hatred of the other.
One may support a conceptual entity based on some rational criteria, a university for its academic credentials; a sport team for its skill set relative to the others or its proximity; a political position for its support of your values; without it becoming a religious passion. If the rational criteria change the support will vanish.
Religion for me involves two components. The first is an irrational belief in the superiority of some conceptual entity, God, the Buddha, The Tao, Deepak Chopra, a sport team, a political position, etc. The second is a passionate commitment to that belief in the sense of spending considerable time and money on following the belief. Wearing the "colors," going to events, socializing preferentially with those of a similar religion, and usually dislike or hatred of the other.
One may support a conceptual entity based on some rational criteria, a university for its academic credentials; a sport team for its skill set relative to the others or its proximity; a political position for its support of your values; without it becoming a religious passion. If the rational criteria change the support will vanish.
Saturday, February 21, 2015
The Arts Make Education Work
No wonder the religitards are trying to kill it.
Note, the term "retard" applied to one who is normally intelligent insults no one else. Those with mental challenges are not retarded. They do very well with their native intelligence.
http://www.times-standard.com/arts-and-entertainment/20150220/hollywood-star-tim-robbins-visits-hayward-school
Worth a click. Tim inherited his father's passion for promoting and teaching the arts.
HAYWARD -- Academy Award-winning actor Tim Robbins spent Friday at a Hayward elementary school, joining children in a staged reading, singing with the chorus, answering questions and watching students work on computer art projects as he promoted the arts in schools.
His visit was part of Turnaround Arts, a program to improve students' grades and attendance through the arts.
"I am here today because of the importance of arts in education. When I was in school, I went from being a good student in grade school to a struggling student in high school. The arts became a lifeline for me," he said Friday
Wednesday, February 18, 2015
Bonfires (or incindiaries) on Campus
AKA The World is on Fire Lets Piss on the Candle We Can Put Out.
Although I am disappointed that Cal Alpha failed in minor ways to live up to the ideals of the True Gentleman and the fraternity traditions, I am not at all surprised that they and other SAE chapters reflect the privileged male culture in the US that continue to openly assert that women are kitchen slaves at best and the property of men whether they are related to the man at all. The military, the police, the right wing(?) media, some important churches and many prominent politicians create that culture. Unfortunately none of the above are likely to appoint a Title IX administrator to clean up their culture.
Universities and colleges have the same problems but properly take the stance that as community leaders they should deal with them. My concern is that draconian sanctions for minor offenses sends the wrong message about free association and free speech to the Stanford Community. To wit: Fraternities are the only fall guys we have that we can pick on so they have to go. See Etchemendy's one strike and you are out pronouncement.
I am not concerned with bailing out Cal Alpha or SAE, appropriate responses by Stanford and National have been taken and are in place. But they cannot have any effect on the house if the house does not exist even for an academic year. Stanford should be a leader in creating a responsible social environment on campus and the fraternities and sororities should be the safe houses and leaders rather than the fall guys for failures all over the campus.
From
my conversation with Laird it seemed like the house handled everything
well, and the University had to do something, anything, to make a Title
IX statement. Lets see what he has to say.
Hey,
college fraternities throw parties that women attend. Everybody hates
fraternities because they weren't tapped. Now we got news.
Phi Alpha, needed more than ever at this point. Stretch your memories it is relevant.
I understand that Stanford is under considerable pressure due to Title IX, current events, and campus protests to do something – anything – to show that the University cares about women’s rights. But a death penalty for one of the few vibrant, women friendly, social organizations in the Stanford social desert sends the wrong message, for the wrong reasons, at the wrong time.
The wrong message: Any voluntary gathering of men and women will be subject to “special scrutiny” under Title IX. Have a mixed social gathering only at risk to the existence of your organization. Essentially you are saying that social gender segregation is the policy of Stanford.
The wrong reason: A hostile environment refers to an environment like a workplace or classroom where people are not able to avoid the offending material without severe consequences. Being pelted with grapes for walking out is not a severe consequence in the case of the annual Roman Bath party apparently eagerly anticipated by both the men of SAE and the women of Pi Phi who knew that improv. stand-up, dark humor was going to be a feature of the party.
The wrong time: Announcing a death penalty for a popular organization after most students have left campus to celebrate a busy, merry holiday with friends and family hoping that nobody would notice sends the message to the media, the student body, and the parties involved that the only reason for the death penalty was to have something to show Title IX snoops if they showed up at Stanford. The burning match appeal the first week of classes is further evidence that Stanford is making a political statement, not a transparent, reasoned action for the benefit of the University community.
As a 52 year alum who greatly benefited from my time in the SAE House on Lasuen Row and have viewed my SAE Reunions with my brothers and “Little Sisters of Minerva” as one of the main reasons to attend Stanford Class Reunions. I strongly protest this unnecessary and disgraceful action.
Sincerely,
Sincerely,
Other comments roughly reverse time sequence.
If you are
going to throw guilt by association in the pot the administrator came
from Ohio, politically and socially one of the most sexist and violent
states outside of the deep south and Wisconsin. Boehner is their US Representative.
Lets
not throw the house under the bus just yet. Minor lapses in judgement,
I wouldn't call it hazing in any sense of the word. We had brothers
hurt being tossed in the fountain for lesser crimes. Underage drinking?
I remember a punch called the Red Death that more than a few underage
people had trouble with. We had to be a bit more circumspect in the
house, but times have changed.
Yawn. Sexual Assault Exaggerations
are news. Where is the most likely place to be sexual assaulted today?
At the festivities around professional sports events. Why isn't that
news? D'oh. Where is another likely place to be sexually assaulted, a
church social. Why isn't that news? D'oh. Lets look at the Military.
Why isn't that news? D'oh. What's left? Colleges. When are you most
likely to be sexually asaulted on campus? Game Day! Why isn't that news?
D'oh.
True Gentlemen,
I
am not threatening anytthing at this point. Just trying to get a
reasonable conversation going with the appropriate people at Stanford. I
think the appropriate people will begin with President Hennessy as the
issue is not the dehousing of SAE but an assault on free speech, free
association, and traditional Stanford social life, the last having no
legal standing but is why legal issues will be the primary assault
weapons.
The
damage to a pledge's name, to the fraternity's continued existence on
campus, and indeed the existence of fraternities on campus has already
been established with the announcement of the dehousing as a fait
accompli based in part on the remarks of a pledge. All of that makes
makes Corry a huge reason why Stanford and at least the Old Lions should
sit down and talk about undoing the damage. I am not a wealthy person
and $1000 is not something I can easily afford to invest in protectiing
all that is important to me about my Stanford experience but I have
spent more than that for a SAE reunion party.
I
would much prefer to speak softly, but I need a big stick to deal with
the Provost's threat to basic freedoms at Stanford. It doesn't even
have to be a real big stick at this point but it needs to be really
big.
A bit of
background: I was a legacy ΣAE and grew up singing ΣAE songs in the car led
by Charlie Black, Kansas Alpha '23, on our many long road trips including a
respectful love song to the Sweetheart of ΣAE which was a serenade song from the
20's. I
rushed ΣAE only as a courtesy to dad as my
older sisters had convinced me that fraternities were sexist hellholes that I
should avoid at all costs. They were wrong about Cal Alpha.
I attended ΣAE
Leadership School in Evanston and was impressed with the national values of respect
in the fraternity not only for brothers but for all people, particularly
including women. The True Gentleman credo
was evident in all we did at Leadership School.
It was at Leadership School I found out about the Little Sisters of
Minerva for houses to demonstrate their respect and concern for campus
women.
I was instrumental in the founding of the Little
Sisters of Minerva at Cal Alpha when there were few women and no sororities at
Stanford. The Saturday dances on the huge porch facing what is now White Plaza
led by Little Sisters who invited friends to the party were a fixture of
Fraternity Row. Hat tip to The
Lancers, the house band, for the music.
I was social chairman two years, and threw many
parties some of questionable taste (including an annual Toga Party) but part of
my job was to insure that the True Gentleman values of the house and ΣAE
were maintained. By and large they were.
It is no accident that many of the cc’s here are
from the early 60’s. As I remember the
class of ’61 threw a 25th reunion party including neighboring
classes and the Little Sisters, a tradition that has been maintained since with
the 5X reunion class hosting the others.
The reunions are always well attended including Little Sisters some of
whom married brothers and are still happily married after all these years. These reunions are a testimony of the strong
bonds built in living, socializing, playing, and working together in a tight
social environment including the Little Sisters of Minerva.
In my visits to the ΣAE House, both before
and after I moved near campus I have made it a point to notice how the women
visitors were treated and it seemed to me that the Little Sister tradition of
respect and concern has been maintained, including the 2013 pregame party
invite for Alums.
My initial reaction to the SD article was that
even the social suspension was a political overreaction by Stanford to real
abuses on other campuses and nothing
I have seen or heard since changes that opinion at all. No one was physically hurt, bad taste
including sexist atrocities passes for entertainment on Fox News, and a
private, by invitation party implies an acceptance of the invitation. Telling tales out of Vegas is rude in any
society, and overreacting to tales told out of Vegas is just wrong.
From the information provided it appears that the
house measures taken in response to the suspension are more than adequate to
address the nonissue that caused it.
Correspondence
Dear Vice Provost:I understand that Stanford is under considerable pressure due to Title IX, current events, and campus protests to do something – anything – to show that the University cares about women’s rights. But a death penalty for one of the few vibrant, women friendly, social organizations in the Stanford social desert sends the wrong message, for the wrong reasons, at the wrong time.
The wrong message: Any voluntary gathering of men and women will be subject to “special scrutiny” under Title IX. Have a mixed social gathering only at risk to the existence of your organization. Essentially you are saying that social gender segregation is the policy of Stanford.
The wrong reason: A hostile environment refers to an environment like a workplace or classroom where people are not able to avoid the offending material without severe consequences. Being pelted with grapes for walking out is not a severe consequence in the case of the annual Roman Bath party apparently eagerly anticipated by both the men of SAE and the women of Pi Phi who knew that improv. stand-up, dark humor was going to be a feature of the party.
The wrong time: Announcing a death penalty for a popular organization after most students have left campus to celebrate a busy, merry holiday with friends and family hoping that nobody would notice sends the message to the media, the student body, and the parties involved that the only reason for the death penalty was to have something to show Title IX snoops if they showed up at Stanford. The burning match appeal the first week of classes is further evidence that Stanford is making a political statement, not a transparent, reasoned action for the benefit of the University community.
As a 52 year alum who greatly benefited from my time in the SAE House on Lasuen Row and have viewed my SAE Reunions with my brothers and “Little Sisters of Minerva” as one of the main reasons to attend Stanford Class Reunions. I strongly protest this unnecessary and disgraceful action.
Please
note that the above is a personal opinion of a Stanford Alum, not associated in
any way with the current Cal Alpha SAE
Chapter. It was, however, stimulated by
the request for support in their appeal of the dehousing action taken by the
University.
Vice Provost;
You should be aware that
the announcement by the Title IX administrator in re. SAE and related
announcements by Provost Etchemendy have effects far beyond the fate of the
current house and will have major ramifications as to free speech on campus and
indeed traditional social life at Stanford.
A group of Cal Alpha
alums as well as other interested parties have taken interest in some legal
issues in the matter some of which might be germane to your decision.
At the very least the
following case should be relevant.
Full text of opinion
in Corry et al. v. Leland Stanford Junior University et al.
Pertinent excerpt from
Calif. Education Code sec. 94367
"No private
postsecondary educational institution shall make or enforce a rule subjecting a student to disciplinary sanctions solely on the
basis of conduct that is speech or other communication that, when engaged in outside the campus
or facility of a private postsecondary institution, is protected from
governmental restriction by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution or . . . the California Constitution."
Speech by President
Gerhard Casper on Corry decision:
There also appear to be
Title IX issues with applying group sanctions for behavior of individuals that
may be relevant to this type of case.
I am not an attorney so
cannot comment on any of the above but I think you should be aware of our
discussions.
I am not representing
anyone but myself as a Stanford Alum please pass the buck to
President Hennessy. It belongs on his desk.
Comments:
This is an open thread. Anyone may comment anonymously or blog ID.
Labels:
about me..,
sexism,
Social Networks,
social units
Tuesday, February 17, 2015
On Dualism
Guest post
I don't know if this is even worth talking about. As far as I can see, dualism is the culprit. It all goes back to dualism. We have the Genesis story of God creating light, then separating light from dark. As far as I'm concerned, light and dark were only metaphors for good and evil even when man thought there was a God that created light. Once God created light he simultaneously created dark. But I'll move on. From there everything else comes. This world is dark compared to the light worlds, which is is both the Gnostic view and the Christian view. From there, good people are just good (light) and bad people are deplorable (dark) and should be stopped because they threaten to drag all good (light) to the side of dark. If this is what the squabble is all about, why not stop seeing everything as a fight between two opposites. This is how the trouble arose in the first place. What can replace dualism? |
In The Beginning?
beliefnet
Since you have provided no example of something with a beginning that had a cause why should anyone bother. Other than a few quantum events that may or may not have had a beginning everything that happens is the result of a chemical or physical recombination of existing things.
A few billion years ago a galaxy of main sequence stars seeded itself with dust clouds composed of oxygen, nitrogen, carbon, hydrogen, iron and other low molecular weight elements via the well-defined carbon sequence of fusion events. A few were in a configuration to produce novae where higher molecular weight elements could form. These dust clouds in the galaxy www.youtube.com/watch?v=m06aoq3qw7k formed more stars and inertial and gravity effects formed planets around them. Some of those planets were at the right distance from their star to have liquid water in abundance (hydrogen and oxygen are common in the universe) and carbon does its promiscuous chemistry to generate organic compounds that clump together to make things like lipid membranes and large clumps of goo. Some of those large clumps of goo replicate inside a lipid bubble, and make more bits of replicating goo. Some replicators are more successful at gathering resources than others and dominate the ecosystem they are in and life goes on.
Perhaps you can find a beginning in all of that and we can discuss whether or not it had a cause.
... give an example of something with a beginning that has no cause.
Since you have provided no example of something with a beginning that had a cause why should anyone bother. Other than a few quantum events that may or may not have had a beginning everything that happens is the result of a chemical or physical recombination of existing things.
A few billion years ago a galaxy of main sequence stars seeded itself with dust clouds composed of oxygen, nitrogen, carbon, hydrogen, iron and other low molecular weight elements via the well-defined carbon sequence of fusion events. A few were in a configuration to produce novae where higher molecular weight elements could form. These dust clouds in the galaxy www.youtube.com/watch?v=m06aoq3qw7k formed more stars and inertial and gravity effects formed planets around them. Some of those planets were at the right distance from their star to have liquid water in abundance (hydrogen and oxygen are common in the universe) and carbon does its promiscuous chemistry to generate organic compounds that clump together to make things like lipid membranes and large clumps of goo. Some of those large clumps of goo replicate inside a lipid bubble, and make more bits of replicating goo. Some replicators are more successful at gathering resources than others and dominate the ecosystem they are in and life goes on.
Perhaps you can find a beginning in all of that and we can discuss whether or not it had a cause.
Saturday, February 14, 2015
Fundy Atheists
It is impossible to be a fundy atheist, as there is no belief system to follow. Atheists don't even agree on what sort of existence God doesn't have. God may be an imaginary thing in the mind of theists, may not exist at all, or be a vague focus of belief. In any event for an atheist whatever God is it is useless.
On any behavioral scale atheists can be found anywhere as they are human, but generally they fall closer to the normal regions as they don't have vuvuzelas in fancy dresses in over decorated balconies ranting at them constantly that they are worthless sinners. Deconverted theists, especially deconverted Christians, may retain some of this negative self image, a childhood of self-loathing is not easily forgotten, but even the deconverts have managed to lose most of the adverse behavioral effects.
Unlike theists, especially Christians, atheists don't need someone to tell us how to behave, we generally take the day we are given and "rejoice and be glad in it" per Forrest Church, and make it great without help.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)