Yep. Civil marriage is
secular, but it has been so screwed up by religious BS that it is time
to scrap it entirely. Forget the term marriage as it has been focused
on "Leaving her father and cleaving only unto her husband." for so long
that people think it is a sex permit.
These
days there is no need for a sex permit. People have sex. It is none
of the state's business who has the right "To do what, and with which,
and to whom." Anon, Limericks Unlimited.
People may wish to create a household, sharing assets and income and
having certain rights and obligations under common law and tradition.
The state might wish to issue a cohabitation agreement loosely based on
marriage law to facilitate these arrangements. Such an agreement would
not cover dependent children.
People
wishing to take on responsibility for dependents either through
procreation or adoption would be subject to traditional family law,
administered by the state, and hopefully reworked for the benefit and
protection of the dependents. Pretty much ignoring the cohabitation
status of the responsible adults.
DUO
you probably recognise a situation from the old boards where a lesbian
chose to have a child naturally with a gay father who lived separately
but shared parenting and financial responsibility for the child. A
state that can't deal with that situation shouldn't be in the marriage
business.
Yes, 300 is fascist
21 hours ago
No comments:
Post a Comment